<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gordon Gee, The Pac 16 and The End of College Football as We Know It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/big-10-pac-10-expansion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/big-10-pac-10-expansion/</link>
	<description>College football analysis and opinion with a heavy Ohio State bias</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nebraska in the Big Ten by Friday? Notre Dame Says Not So Fast!</title>
		<link>http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/big-10-pac-10-expansion/comment-page-1/#comment-88515</link>
		<dc:creator>Nebraska in the Big Ten by Friday? Notre Dame Says Not So Fast!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/?p=1155#comment-88515</guid>
		<description>[...] an earlier post, I said that conference realignment would come down to whoever was first to jump. At the time, I was thinking that the first move would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an earlier post, I said that conference realignment would come down to whoever was first to jump. At the time, I was thinking that the first move would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annapolisbuckeye</title>
		<link>http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/big-10-pac-10-expansion/comment-page-1/#comment-88327</link>
		<dc:creator>Annapolisbuckeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/?p=1155#comment-88327</guid>
		<description>Dispatch has another story on it this morning. Apparently, the powers that be in the Big Ten met yesterday. Looks like the word coming out of the Pac 10 has got their attention.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/sports/stories/2010/06/07/big-ten-might-expedite-its-expansion-process.html?sid=101&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dispatch story here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dispatch has another story on it this morning. Apparently, the powers that be in the Big Ten met yesterday. Looks like the word coming out of the Pac 10 has got their attention.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/sports/stories/2010/06/07/big-ten-might-expedite-its-expansion-process.html?sid=101" rel="nofollow">Dispatch story here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annapolisbuckeye</title>
		<link>http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/big-10-pac-10-expansion/comment-page-1/#comment-88325</link>
		<dc:creator>Annapolisbuckeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/?p=1155#comment-88325</guid>
		<description>As the prettiest girl without a date, Texas is in a very powerful position. I also think getting the first jump will have a big impact. Once someone flinches, everyone will be forced to act, including the Big 12. 

If the Big 12 does get broken up and Texas makes a move, I&#039;d much rather have Texas than Rutgers. The Big Ten has enough trouble justifying themselves in the eyes of the media. Bringing Texas into the mix would help take care of that problem. Pittsburgh...not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the prettiest girl without a date, Texas is in a very powerful position. I also think getting the first jump will have a big impact. Once someone flinches, everyone will be forced to act, including the Big 12. </p>
<p>If the Big 12 does get broken up and Texas makes a move, I&#8217;d much rather have Texas than Rutgers. The Big Ten has enough trouble justifying themselves in the eyes of the media. Bringing Texas into the mix would help take care of that problem. Pittsburgh&#8230;not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gulfportcarl</title>
		<link>http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/big-10-pac-10-expansion/comment-page-1/#comment-87953</link>
		<dc:creator>gulfportcarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/?p=1155#comment-87953</guid>
		<description>Seems like all the sights are set on Texas, Oklahoma, and OSU, but remember there are 12 teams in the Big Twelve. What happens to Baylor , K St, Kansas, Nebraska, and etc. There other quality programs in the Big Twelve. I also understand the Big Twelve is having  their annual meeting as we speak to decide their fate.  I don&#039;t see a Pac 10- Big Twelve merger, because no one has thought about the travel involved, flying halfway across the country to play football isn&#039;t too appealing.  Travel would be much easier to the Big Ten schools. I don&#039;t see any mergers or teams switching conferences for at least a couple of years. Remember schools schedule 2 to 3 years in advance. Nice to be talking college football again. Tony in Beaverton all these new teams to the Pac 10 would really put you at the bottom of the heap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like all the sights are set on Texas, Oklahoma, and OSU, but remember there are 12 teams in the Big Twelve. What happens to Baylor , K St, Kansas, Nebraska, and etc. There other quality programs in the Big Twelve. I also understand the Big Twelve is having  their annual meeting as we speak to decide their fate.  I don&#8217;t see a Pac 10- Big Twelve merger, because no one has thought about the travel involved, flying halfway across the country to play football isn&#8217;t too appealing.  Travel would be much easier to the Big Ten schools. I don&#8217;t see any mergers or teams switching conferences for at least a couple of years. Remember schools schedule 2 to 3 years in advance. Nice to be talking college football again. Tony in Beaverton all these new teams to the Pac 10 would really put you at the bottom of the heap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/big-10-pac-10-expansion/comment-page-1/#comment-87749</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/?p=1155#comment-87749</guid>
		<description>Texas is in a position where they hold all of the cards. The Rivals article also stated that Texas wouldn&#039;t mind staying in the Big 12 and do a television alliance with the Pac-10. The problem in all of this is the Big 12 is not all on the same page as seen from the meetings in KC, and it could be interesting going forward. Clearly the north teams in the Big 12 feel slighted due to the unbalanced television money and conference title game in Dallas every year. So there&#039;s a lot to work out there.

The Pac-10 looks like they are going to beat the Big-Ten to the punch though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas is in a position where they hold all of the cards. The Rivals article also stated that Texas wouldn&#8217;t mind staying in the Big 12 and do a television alliance with the Pac-10. The problem in all of this is the Big 12 is not all on the same page as seen from the meetings in KC, and it could be interesting going forward. Clearly the north teams in the Big 12 feel slighted due to the unbalanced television money and conference title game in Dallas every year. So there&#8217;s a lot to work out there.</p>
<p>The Pac-10 looks like they are going to beat the Big-Ten to the punch though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/big-10-pac-10-expansion/comment-page-1/#comment-87748</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebuckeyeblog.com/?p=1155#comment-87748</guid>
		<description>All I can say is, if the Pac 10 gets Texas over the Big Ten, I might vomit. If the Pac 10 gets Texas over the Big Ten because Tech isn&#039;t part of the AAU, I will definitely vomit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is, if the Pac 10 gets Texas over the Big Ten, I might vomit. If the Pac 10 gets Texas over the Big Ten because Tech isn&#8217;t part of the AAU, I will definitely vomit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 394/400 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.thebuckeyeblog.com @ 2012-02-07 12:17:24 -->
